I am reading 'Medici effect,' by Frans Johansson. One of the topics in the book particularly interested me. Associative barriers - how we assume certain things with a given set of information without opening our mind to the broader possibilities. Take the test from the book. Susan is twenty-eight years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in biology and minored in public policy. As a student, she was deeply concerned with issues of sustainable development, global warming, and overfishing, and is politically active. Which statement is most likely to be true?
A.–Susan is an office manager.
B.–Susan is an office manager and is active in the environmental
movement.
If you answered B, you are in good company; most people would give that answer. But the correct answer is A. In most instances it would make sense to infer that Susan is active in the environmental movement.
Therefore we are more likely to make assumptions about who Susan is as a person, rather than maintain a mind open to possibilities.
Well, why am I posting something like this? It is because I keep hearing people passing judgement about others or events without delving into details. For instance, if India is playing cricket, the comment I hear is, "why watch a stupid game like this. Anyway, we will lose." Being quite tolerant, I just dismiss such statements. What's intriguing, however, is the obsession for winning. Winning by definition is 'beating' a set of people slotted as competitors.
It is very common to see young kids being pushed to be winners. They go for tuition's, music lessons, cricket coaching to name a few activities - all aimed at winning. I could hear one of my neighbours questioning her son, "oh! 89? How much did Rohan score?" It was certainly not something a third standard boy was expecting. The silence said it all. As Tony Schwartz, President and CEO of The Energy Project said, "What winners recognize, above all, is that the ultimate goal is never to vanquish an opponent or to prove something to others, but rather to more fully realize their own potential, whatever that may be." Feel, teachers and parents should open up their mind and allow kids to unleash their true potential. The only way to do that is by redefining the word winning. Go back in time to check what Charles Darwin observed. When the environment is changing rapidly, it is neither the strongest nor the most intelligent who survive — it is the ones who are most adaptable. Well, the first step towards winning is to accept the world's changing.
1 comment:
I agree.Adaptability(?!)is a big asset.But coming to cricket,I still keep my opinion.hehehe:)
Post a Comment